In search of a better persistence API(摘)

2008-02-23 10:11:29来源:互联网 阅读 ()

新老客户大回馈,云服务器低至5折

60% JDBC
20% Homegrown Persistence Framework
10% O/R Mapping Tools
5% Java Data Objects (JDO)
5% EJB CMP / BMP
0% Service Data Objects (SDO)

Considering that ORM only has 10% of the market, and "seldom is a good choice in systems typically with very large dataset and complex queries" one can wonder what the fuss is all about?

Why not settle for a common abstraction layer and let each run according to own taste. It should be obvious by now that it is never going to be any consensus between the different persistence camps.

One big advantage is that it will not be necessary to frisk for weapons at the entrance to conferences and seminars! :)

Yi Zhou:
"I propose a cohesive persistence layer based on Spring Persistence Layer"

The obvious solution. (Think logic, reason, common sense. Exist for both Java and .net) Can anyone imagine how much money that could be saved by this approach? All over the world?

Unfortunatly there is never possible to settle for anything obvious as long as a committee is involved.

Regards
Rolf Tollerud

上一篇: Hibernate实践(一)
下一篇: Hibernate实践(二)

标签:

版权申明:本站文章部分自网络,如有侵权,请联系:west999com@outlook.com
特别注意:本站所有转载文章言论不代表本站观点,本站所提供的摄影照片,插画,设计作品,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有

上一篇:Junit3.8.1代码阅读—执行流程(textui)

下一篇:[引用] 既然有了Swing, 那为什么还要SWT?